Criminal Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 2

Criminal Justice - Essay ExampleThis dissertation will look into the case of extract of Connecticut versus Jeff capital of Mississippi, which will outline activities that took place after the appeal in the appellant motor hotel. It will also discuss criminal jurisprudence and honor of defendants proof of free from criminal charges beyond any reasonable doubt. The courts, in accordance to criminal justice, conduct justice operations in discordant ways that give a plaintiff a chance for probation revocation appeal and plea-bargaining that do take place in between the time of bind warrant and sentencing (Connecticut, 2011). The laws of Connecticut were officially released on a date when a slip of opinion was the operative appellate petitions and filing of cases was certified as a way acceptance appeals. In that date, Jeffrey Jackson appealed to the Appellate court for conviction of judgment, which was concluded by the board in the trial court after his trial. Jeffery Jackson was given a warrant of arrest due to possession and use of narcotic drugs and in violation of General Statutes that resulted to trial by courts jury. After hearings, the defendant proved his innocence of allegations to a point of reasonable doubt (Connecticut, 2011). This had diluted the burden that required proof to take improper judgment. The Appellate Court on consideration of defendants claim, with the reversing of the judgment by the jury of the trial, Jeffrey Jackson requested for a new hearing in the Appellate court. Thereafter, the Appellate court accepted the request on a declares petition that guaranteed certification to consider appeal, but with limited issues regarding the Appellate court (Katz, 2007). The courts jury objection to statutory evidence that abided with criteria of operation in the law firm was not to be considered by the Appellate court. The jury objected to requests from the Appellate court regarding determination of overall judgment as per instructions refer ring to reasonable doubt. The impermissible burden of proof was diluted improperly according to state of opinion set by the jury upon the Appellate court. While incarcerated at a correctional center, Jeff Jackson underwent strips of searches led by a correctional officer to provide reasonable evidence of possession of the narcotic drugs. The jury ordered a state of carriage of burden that required proofing substantial and empirical evidence. This problematical blood tests from samples of blood from Jeffrey Jackson as well as tests for positive result from use of cocaine (Connecticut, 2011). Proof beyond reasonable doubt leaves the plaintiff firmly convinced that the defendant is guilty or not guilty, from the fact that the jury has absolute certainty for siding with the defendant, and not the plaintiff but constituting criminal maintenance of judicial and law ethics. The procedural history was additional facts that were exceptional according to the defendants routines that involv ed carrying procedural activities most of them that differed from the presentation given by jurys ruling. The jury did not ordain a standard charge in the basis of reasonable doubt decision making and ruling as per the plaintiffs charges (Connecticut, 2011). The reason as to why the jury did not describe reasonable doubt in the case of Jeffrey Jackson was the reasonable prudence that hesitated to fare more weighty cases that awaited the jurys intervention. The court acknowledged difference in trial and sentencing in the